TN AMENDMENT 1 – FOR THE LOVE OF ALL THAT IS PERSONAL FREEDOM, VOTE NO!

(photo cred: http://clearstreammedia.blogspot.com/2012/08/rally-and-march-for-womens-rights-sunday.html)

Alright, I’m a lawyer and still fresh from law school (meaning I still love to attack like a pit bull and haven’t had the fight ground out of me by the trudge through the legal process yet), so you knew this was coming.

Enter the SOAPBOX!!!

Which, lets face it, I need since I’m so short.

For those in Tennessee, I’m saying this right up front, VOTE NO on Am. 1.

The language they want to put into the Tennessee Constitution as an amendment is,

“Nothing in this Constitution secures or protects a right to abortion or requires the funding of an abortion. The people retain the right through their elected state representatives and state senators to enact, amend, or repeal statutes regarding abortion, including, but not limited to, circumstances of pregnancy resulting from rape or incest or when necessary to save the life of the mother.” –  http://www.plannedparenthood.org/planned-parenthood-middle-east-tennessee/proposed-abortion-ban-tennessee#sthash.LNME1D4t.dpuf

This is to quell the abortion rights the TN Supreme Court said women had in the 2000 case

PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE v. Don SUNDQUIST –  http://caselaw.findlaw.com/tn-supreme-court/1171782.html#sthash.NtS2Y1AJ.dpuf

There, the Court struck down some of TN’s abortion laws as unconstitutional under the state constitution. So here, 14 years later, those self proclaimed “pro-lifers” (a hilarious term for it considering the last line of their proposed amendment) are trying to roll those rights back by specifically saying the TN Constitution doesn’t protect any rights having to do with abortions.

Now, this would not automatically send us back to the dark ages of the US before 1973, because we would still have the ruling of the Supreme Court of the US (affectionately known as SCOTUS) of Roe v. Wade, the seminal case that first said a woman had a right to her own body and to an abortion before viability. It’s something. SCOTUS later restricted this by saying states could pass laws restricting and regulating abortions as long as they did not place an “undue burden” on the women.

And states ran with it.

States have been pushing the definition of undue burden since. States like Texas pushed it so far with their restrictions that those have been appealed up to SCOTUS. Roe v. Wade has been under attack since it came out. And we thought things were getting better for women, more equal, right? Yeah, we were wrong.

If this amendment passes, TN legislatures will be free to pass all kinds of restrictions on women’s rights to our own bodies. And the only thing standing in their way will be Roe v. Wade, and that bitch is wayyyyyy the fuck out there. Do you know how long it usually takes to get something to the Supreme Court? Years. During that time, unless you can get the Court to place a stay on enforcement, your rights can be stripped away and there’s not a damn thing you can do about it but wait or go to a different state.

So, I reiterate, Vote No on Am. 1.

Advertisements

One thought on “TN AMENDMENT 1 – FOR THE LOVE OF ALL THAT IS PERSONAL FREEDOM, VOTE NO!

  1. My boy shared this on Facebook and he has a lot of crazy friends because he’s a gun-rights activist and for some reason people are too stupid to see outside right or left politics and think if they’re for gun rights they have to be against women and gay rights. They were shocked and horrified to find out he wasn’t as bigoted as they were. It was funny.

    My response to one of them saying it’s only nine months and then she can give it up for adoption:

    My issue with people saying you can always put it up for adoption is they in that sentence are sentencing you to nine months (or however long you would have left on the term after you find out and make the decision to abort) of your body not being your own. Why are your rights lessened because you are pregnant? Now, people say that’s because they’re balancing your rights with the rights of the unborn child.

    And that’s where the debate breaks down. You either think a fetus is a person or you don’t. I don’t. I don’t see how anyone could think of it as a person when it’s essentially a tadpole. But that’s my opinion. They think it’s a person and therefore it has rights. And then they extend that argument that it’s a balancing act to the conclusion that one life wins out over nine months of treating the woman as an incubator.

    From what I can tell, this idea that a bunch of cells inside you is its own person comes from some religions. They think it has a soul at conception and is therefore human. There’s nothing you can argue that will convince them that it’s not murder once they hit that point.

    So then they say it’s murder to have an abortion, end of story.

    You can’t argue with religion. You can’t prove a negative. All you can do is try to convince the people who aren’t sure to go your way to protect rights, and convince the ones with you to get out and vote.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s